The Israeli rocket strikes on Mount Qasioun last night produced an almost immediate explosion of Twitter commentary, despite the wee hours when the action took place. Those opposed to the Syrian opposition – whether for fear of the Jihadists or Syria falling into the hands of a Saudi-Israeli-US axis – were sort of triumphant at seeing the rebels exposed on the same battlefield as the Israelis, while there was perhaps some embarrassment dressed up as bravura from the other side. Either way, the massacred civilians of Banias have fallen off the news cycle, not that global media attention has really made any difference to anything, despite the intense glare directed at this most horrific of conflicts.*
This is what set people off – rebels in the main video footage that went viral muttering Allahu akbar as the bombs rained down and fire clouds rose:
There was some online debate about whether that was really meant as a celebratory statement, but it seems likely from the way it’s said that it was; it wasn’t clear at this stage who was conducting the attacks (though it was hardly FSA standard fare). Anyway, the image of Syrian rebels cheering on the Israeli military has already seered itself in people’s minds.
Which led to:
More bombing always makes things worse, always. Israel’s interference in Lebanon’s Civil War caused more death and destruction, not less.
— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) May 5, 2013
or:
Whoever cheers at the Israeli bombing of an Arab country, regardless of reasons or pretexts, can never be one of us. Never.
— Doc Jazz ✌ طارق (@docjazzmusic) May 5, 2013
And analysis from journalists, such as:
If Israel thinks that it can secure itself from the Syrian chaos by dropping some bombs, it is dead wrong.
— Mahir Zeynalov (@MahirZeynalov) May 5, 2013
and:
Is #FSA taking advantage of the situation by attacking #SAA checkpoints now, or did it have advance notice of airstrikes? #Syria
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) May 5, 2013
On the other side, there was an attempt to bring the discussion back to the war on the ground:*
The #mumana3a trolls are out. Screeching about #Israel, yet dancing on murdered children’s corpses in #Banias. #Syria#Lebanon
— Rana Kabbani (@RanaKabbani54) May 5, 2013
While some stated boldly that:
Damascus was celebrating yesterday night: huge explosions over Qasion Mount in Damascus after Israeli attack
— Hassan Hassan حسن (@hhassan140) May 5, 2013
Or suggested that “the Israeli raids on Syria mean that the United States and Israel have chosen to carry out surgical operations here and there rather than engage with the revolutionaries”, so it wasn’t support for the rebels at all:
الغارات الإسرائيلة في سوريا تعني أن الولايات المتحدة وإسرائيل إختارتا ألا تتعاطى مع الثوار بل التعاطي مع الوضع بعمليات جراحية هنا وهناك.
— Hassan Hassan حسن (@hhassan140) May 5, 2013
And a number of observers picked up on Egyptian-Palestinian poet Tamim al-Barghouti’s comments on Saturday, after an earlier Israeli attack on what appeared to be a convoy of weaponry heading into Lebanon for Hizbullah. Barghouti insisted on according Hizbullah the respect of a “resistance” movement that the Syrian opposition rejects (tweeting, “He who fires shots at Hizbullah fires them with Israel”):*
Takhween and skewed values alive and well in the Arab world “@tamimbarghouti: من يطلق الرصاص على حزب الله يطلقه مع إسرائيل”
— Emile Hokayem(@emile_hokayem) May 5, 2013
Meanwhile, the Israeli report that Assad’s regime used chemical weaponry against its opponents – which provoked a week of debate over whether Obama’s infamous “red line” had been crossed – may have been intended as the requisite fig leaf Israel sought to take major action against Assad and/or his weaponry, some suggested.
But wait – maybe the red line was never intended to be as red as that after all:
the cock-up theory of foreign policy? @nytimes says #Obama pledge on #Syria chemical weapons was off the cuff remark nyti.ms/13eIPvG
— Jeremy Bowen (@BowenBBC) May 5, 2013
_____________________________________________________________________
* disclosure! – I tweeted too: https://twitter.com/hammonda1
* mumana3a = resistance
* takhween = to accuse of treachery
Mike
It’ll be interesting to see how it develops. I can’t say that I side with the Syrians (but I also don’t agree that Israel needed to bomb Syria as a result).
creative way to make money
creative way to make money
Hammonda. » Blog Archiv » Israel attacks Syria: A Night on Twitter